Category: Bible

  • What the Bible Doesn’t Say About Its Characters

    What Scripture Narrates Instead of Verdicts

    One of the more disorienting things about reading the Bible closely is realizing how rarely it hands you a verdict. We come to the text looking for a moral scorecard — was this person good, or bad? — and the text mostly refuses to answer.

    Take Moses. Exodus 2:11-12. Before he becomes the man who leads Israel out of Egypt, he kills an Egyptian overseer for beating a Hebrew slave. The narrative doesn’t pause to rule on it. It doesn’t say “this was righteous zeal” because the act is for his people and it doesn’t say “this was murder, full stop.” It simply tells you what happened next: Moses is found out, and he flees into the wilderness of Midian.

    That flight looks, on the surface, like punishment — exile, loss of status, a man running for his life. But it’s also where the next chapter of his story actually begins. At a well in Midian, he helps the daughters of a priest water their flock, and through that encounter he meets Zipporah, who becomes his wife. The very consequence that looks like ruin turns out to be the doorway into the next stage of his formation — years of quiet, obscurity, and shepherding that shape him long before he ever stands in front of Pharaoh.

    The pattern worth noticing: Scripture tends to narrate consequence, not character rating.

    It doesn’t stamp people “good” or “bad” and move on. It shows what they did, and it shows what followed — and it trusts the reader to sit with the ambiguity rather than resolve it for them.

    So maybe the more honest way to read these stories isn’t “was this person good or evil,” but “what did this cost them, what did God do with it, and did they stay postured toward Him afterward.” Moses killed a man and ran. He also became the one through whom a nation was freed. Both things are true, and the Bible seems entirely comfortable leaving them both on the page, unresolved into a single verdict.